Kef r3 audio science review. The b&w truly shines in the midrange.

Kef r3 audio science review The R3 truly present small details with equal KEF R3 Speaker Review. Descartes Major Contributor. Unfortunately this is the only measurement available for freq response of the 7K. I don't think you can take much from it. 5 kHz. I listen to stereo music, I am still to explore multi-channel audio, but that would require proper rear surrounds too so I'll probably keep an eye on OG R3 deals and at some point either replace the Q350s or move them to the ceiling for Atmos. However, UPS tore the side of the box and caused some minor cosmetic wear Hi, I measured the KEF R3 meta loudspeakers this time. The blending/transition from low to mid's and high's is smoother in a way. I'm looking at KEF R3 and Neumann KH120 for stereo home theater and The room response gives a picture of the steady state SPL, where sound generation and sound dissipation in the room have reached their equilibrium. For the office/desk . Let me clarify the points I'm trying to make: In most cases, the KEF R3 sounds best with no toe in. This matches everyone's response except Amir's. It's a bit like my hobby, let's say. I am going to buy MiniDSP Flex and I would like to cross them over digitally. => So Moreover, it's even in KEF's measurements. To my ears the R3 and ls50 sound neutral (hence confused with being dark) with the same amp and source. Thread starter amirm; Founder, Audio Science Review Founder, Madrona Digital Review Thread Rules My Technical Background My YouTube Indeed, but that excess of energy is very small in level all things considered. If you are looking for bookshelf speakers maybe it's worth to check out some ELAC BS Compare the top plate to the large top plate that comes with the Kanto and the dimensions of the hole locations on the R3. EQing the R3 to match the LS50 could be educational. I A few keen eyes noticed I was testing the Kef R3 and caught my measurements, too, showed a dip ~1kHz. This does not mean it will have the best sound or widest soundstage with extreme toe in. Enveloping sound. I've done all I can with my room treatments/speaker placement, so hoping to to add some room correction via DIRAC hello guys i need some help with my setup. If for also music listening, KEF R3, no contest. 5 and would be 8. However, I am willing to spend a bit more to get that last bit of clarity and dynamics. For the DJ setup they need to be high for standing, and in a roughly 1m equilateral triangle. After comparing the specifications and measurements of the KEF R3 and KEF Q100, the higher sensitivity of the former is compensated by its lower minimum impedance (usually in 3-ways), so more or less the power For the crossover difference, it is evident that it has been modified on the new R3 Meta (the Kef site also says that modifications have been made, better quality capacitors have been installed, etc. Kef R3: - is US$1700/pair =>or 70% more expensive - Preference Score is 6. If not, I am thinking of the KEF LS50 Meta Crossing the metas will improve the overall performance from KEF LS50m that's right, but block the port of the KEF R3 and cross them at 80hz will improve the R3s ASR's recent LS50 Meta review shows it to be much closer to the R3 than the original, so even KEF seems to feel that's preferable. So I am looking to upgrade my three front speakers and am wondering what would work best 3 KEF LS50 Meta or 3 KEF R3 all my surround speakers are KEF LS50 first generation. Also our sofa is only 9 feet away from the front speakers and listen at moderate volume maximum 85db for movies. That seems like a pretty big jump from the Q350 to R3, but it's not the same Some little birds saying R serie is being discontinued and new R3 Meta coming at February 2023. I haven't received them yet. Hopefully I'll have the real review up in the next month or so. Listening to the Kef R3 for the first time, I finally understood what the term Micro dynamics meant. The review on this website is a brief overview and summary of the objective performance of this speaker. Reactions: Descartes. The speakers, in broad terms, could be good or bad BTW, @hardisj of Erin's Audio Corner has reviewed the BMR and has R3 review samples in his possession, so we will soon have objective reviews of both from the same source. Maybe not too many regular people are on Revel M16 vs R3 is an interesting comparison. The KEF R3 is nice and tidy and articulate if not a touch Edit: I re-read my initial comment. These speakers have just been released, but I was able to get a pre-order sample (a pair) from an audiophile in Korea. Currently using an old Arcam A65+ for the Amp, and have experienced some good sessions so far. ) this too made me think of this difference on the mid-highs, for I think the meta update is not going to affect the unbalanced mid-highs in any Initially, when I had the BMR on my left and the R3 on the right, the R3 seemed harsher and more piercing while the BMR was bassier and more enjoyeable on tracks like Thank you for the great review, Erin. The current placement is: speakers are as close to the front wall as possible to even out the response in 60-100HZ with I'm not disagreeing with KEF engineers. The fact that you said classical music made the speakers sound closer reaffirms my belief this preference is directivity related, as classical recordings include more spatial information in the recording PEQ the 120 to 500 Hz range individualy L, R towards SPL @ 120~130 Hz (where the deep is), & L peak to R SPL level at about 65 Hz. If you are interested, you may find my pre-review video useful and insightful. Re your meta vs r3 - my r3 opens up at louder volumes for my mid size room while my ls50 is awesome for my smaller study. If one prefers wider directivity, or is most used to the sound of it, the R3 is going to sound less enveloping. After months trying to find a good deal on a discounted, open box or second hand pair of M105, M106, S400, Aria or R3, I have finally purchased a pair of second hand KEF R3. With a sub, r3 crossed at 80hz, meta at 100hz, it became splitting hairs. Spotify Connect, DLNA) and watching tv shows/movies from my Apple TV 4K. Yamaha r-n1000a integrated amp/ network R3 has an upward shelving treble in the PIR that starts at 2-3 kHz. Maybe just a preference Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. Amir’s review, with or without the update, isn’t really surprising since he lives with Salon 2s. Hi ASR, I ordered a pair of Kef r3 new from their site for a good price $1399. It is not intended to be a deep dive. Below are the results from an initial blind test comparing these speakers to my existing Ascend Sierra 2-EX bookshelf speakers. " -Linkwitz "Blind reliance It seems like every review that isn't perfect has people questioning if it's damaged. Detailed guitars and mid-bass vs all 2-way speakers; Brighter and sweeter acoustic piano; I have Kef R3's on my desk. Part 1: Picture & initial impressions Part 2: Near-field response Part Ok according to kef’s spec R11 crosses the bass drivers at 330Hz R7 and R5 at 400Hz R3 at 420Hz . If I pull up Megadeth's Remastered countdown to extinction album - or original CD quality, it is almost unlistenable at even moderate volumes. If you prefer the less-flat sound, that's okay. A proper comparison would be to put a high pass filter to R3 to limit its the comparison you posted is looking at the 'short port' version Yes, and the fact it exists matters much. I No. Will KEF R3 Speaker Review. Kef R3 just dropped on sale last night to be US$1700/pair Take the US$500 savings, and purchase an amp, and you're ahead. The b&w truly shines in the midrange. Correcting the Anyway, I'm also interested in the Lintons because of the positive reviews and looks, but if it was only for this video, they would be last speakers on my list :) A lot of the speakers in that video sound off in one way or another. " -Linkwitz "Blind reliance on measurements can be misleading ‐ Hi. I don't have the financial wherewithal to indiscriminately "try" speakers like this, and the most fundamental understanding of the underlying physics indicates that the Metas - of which I would never express disapproval - couldn't keep up with a speaker offering all that plus a dedicated third-way sub. Moreso, this is information for those who prefer “just the facts” and prefer to have the data without the filler. Using an example might be best. If it were the other way around and he lived with R3s instead he might think the Salon 2s cacophonous with fuzzy imaging. Tldr: For large rooms - r3, small rooms and desktop - ls50. Short answer: go for the R3 if your environment Hi, hoping to get some advice! I use my 2. Tweeter xover also varies between the models , so they seems to optimise for the complete speakers in some way . First, they sound extremely similar to me, which isn’t shocking. Particularly electronic music at lower volumes (~60 db) sounds way too snappy to me and at these volumes the speaker isn't really able to generate a big soundstage. You might just like that sound, or most of your favorite recordings could have similar flaws. Putting it the other way around, R3 simply will not benefit nearly as much as LS50 Meta KEF R3 Speaker Review. I have the kef r3 paired with an arcam sa10 but im not enjoying it for me sounds like a little bit dead like the speakers are just not getting enough juice and not crisp enough so i was thinking maybe this combination Rotel RB-1582 with Rotel RC-1572 or if anyone have a better idea under 1,800usd. Click to expand Yeah, so I believe the assumption is the mid on the LS50 does need to move more than 1mm, the simulation post I linked above suggested it needs at least 3mm. I am also buying UMIK-2 to be able to measure real in-room frequency response. I’m not set on the R3, so I would also take some recommendations for other speakers from you. Bird name is Stig. I meant to say the reviews are all positive. I'm contemplating switching up my speakers, currently Harbeth P3ESRs, which are actually very nice in the near field but utterly lacking in the lower frequencies. But even with a long port it looks less weird than R3, more like closed box: Let's wait the next generation and see if I've also wondered about KEFs lineup/pricing strategy in general. 1 system (w/ KEF KC 62) primarily for digital sources/music (ie. I think for the KEF R3 is -3 dB @ 65 Hz and has a bump in the treble on a mostly flat FR graph. Q350 is $650, R3 is $2k and Ref1 is $8k. Revel M16 is -3 dB @ 60 Hz and has a bump in the bass and slightly rolled-off treble on a mostly flat FR graph. Trying to take advantage of the sale that's going on now essentially. Option 2: Buy amp now (Max: $1500) and a cheap Sony SSCS5 ($89 pair) and then upgrade to the KEF R3 later (if still on sale). They’re expertly sonically balanced and work well across a wide range of systems, but give them a top class feed and they will deliver a sound good enough to worry most Below is the one I have created for the Kef R3 which holds a lot of promise (subjectively and objectively) as quality bookshelf speakers. Of these 3 the Linton's would be last for me. In addition to the test itself being blind, the third party doing the subjective listening has no bias coming into this and no opinion on these speakers (nor Option 1: Buy KEF R3 on sale now and buy the amp later. But this is by no means based upon anything objectively reliable. 2 with a perfect subwoofer. As an FYI, I happen to be a bit of a KEF fanboi, and I own R11s. I measured the KEF R3 meta loudspeakers this time. Let's talk about the 'big' standmounts. :) Not that suprising if true as there is some good deals for the R serie currently. Talk to the seller, say you have 750€, maybe he'll bite. All data collected using Klippel’s Near-Field Scanner. I wasn't saying the KEF R3'S were bad. Sep 26, 2023; Thread Starter #7 Brian6751 said: Tough call. Honestly I am not sure with this graph, I felt the midbas between R11 and 7K quite similar, only the 7K digged much deeper. Also the clarity of sound from the R3 seems to be better to me. The fun part of the thread is that we don’t realize how amazing either of the speakers are. The R3 doesn't show it much, but there's a little blip around 900Hz: Meanwhile, it's very apparent in the R7 and R11's I recently bought a pair of KEF R3's as my first bookshelf speakers, and I dont really feel comfortable with them. D. Joined Dec 27, 2020 Messages 2,537 Likes 1,377. Even it it was, it would ressemble the widely appreciated BBC dip which many correlate with nice The old R3 was already excellent, it might be hard to justify the more then double price here in the EU. Speakers will sit in the box until I get the amp. I assume that it will be out of warranty (no original invoice). For clarity, I'm not saying that Super Linton is not good speakers, it is just that the sound I heard yesterday was quite hollow and lack mid vocal presence with a bit low dynamic. It works with the Kanto large top plate , so if the top plate is as big or bigger than that it will work. KEF R3. Them: "With the Uni-Q, KEF speakers will produce an extremely wide sound stage without any toe-in. For both the D&D 8C and the KEF R3 you mentioned that they sounded better in your living room than your home theater room. Bass performance is better than Kef R3 meta but mid and treble is less Hi everyone, This is my first attempt to room measurement. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. So based on the tenths of youtube reviews and even more forum posts/ reviews (here and elsewhere) I read, I am thinking of the following equipment match with the KEF R3. . The R3 now shows a widening in radiation in the range of 2-3kHz both horizontally and vertically, which may cause the sound to become somewhat harsh at higher sound The old R300 were pretty good already, then R3 were still better and now of course R3 Meta better yet. Depending on certain variables like room acoustics and setup, some toe-in may help enhance sound reproduction in the Founder, Audio Science Review Founder, Madrona Digital Review Thread Rules My Technical Background I measured the KEF R3 meta loudspeakers this time. Considering the sale right now, I think it's a no brainer to get the R3. Its sound like one big ball of shouty At higher listening distances and/or listening sound pressure levels the R3 is a better choice, unless you plan to add some sub(s) to the LS50 Meta. One of the speakers has been sold as defective with a "bad woofer driver". The r3 definitely wins without a sub, but that’s not shocking either. These new standmounters are part of KEF’s updated R Series, a revamped speaker range that now incorporates the bookshelf speakers buchardt s400 mk2 kef ls50 meta kef r3 kef r3 meta revel m105 revel m16 subwoofer Replies: 12 Forum: Speaker Reviews, Measurements and Discussion OK, so its another Genelec vs KEF 3 post. I don't really like them. The Near-Field-Scanner 3D (NFS) offers a fully automated acoustic measurement of New to the The Absolute Sound team, Thomas&Stereo, reviews the highly anticipated KEF R3 Meta. U bestelt KEF speakers 24 uur per dag, Go 3-way as KEF did with the R3 to keep the excursion of the mid cone to a minimum. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free! Forums. It can be countered with a -2 dB high shelf filter @ 2. However, for those who want more - a detailed explanation of the object KEF R3 Meta: The Speaker to Beat. OP . At lower listening distances and/or listening sound pressure levels the LS50 I would like to stay under 800€, so the R3 for 850€ would be a bit above the budget but I would spent it, if it’s worth it. In the mid size room the ls50 struggles with higher volume. The KEF R3 Meta speakers are an enticing prospect. I am an audio enthusiast and I really like to experiment with my system to seek an increasingly engaging but also technically more perfect experience. And the only way for you to find out if it sounds better to you is by listening, preferably in your room with Finally Micro and Macro dynamics are also in a league above the SVS ultras. As a person I'm planning on buying some Kef R3s for my DJ setup and office and wondering options of how to mount them. My goal is to acoustically optimize the room. A couple PMs from two different people noting the shadow flare KEF R3 Meta are giving me the impression that they are more balanced speakers. Thread starter amirm; Start date Mar 12, 2020; On the other hand, the kef may sound sharper and more focused. Sure it's comparing apples and oranges, but above roughly 200 Hz LS50 Meta are better than R3 in pretty much every technical aspect. Admittedly, I've more experiences with Kef and prefer Kef R3 and R3 meta sound profile. For strictly home theater, I could go either way. My friend has b&w 805d3 along with ls50s and kEf r900. I recently bought KEF R3 and have been impressed with them. Al meer dan 30 jaar een vertrouwd adres voor Foto, Film, Hifi, pasfoto’s, witgoed, TV en meer. The settings I recommended in my first post serve There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. It will have the widest sweet spot with extreme toe in. I'm having replaced my R3's and R2C because of cosmetical issues on the lacker, KEF was very supportive of my case and provided excellent customer service. This will also give you the largest soundstage in most cases. Community platform by It still surprises me how people can get to listen night and day differences between two speakers that are more similar than different as is the case for R3 and LS50 Meta. I have KEF R3 loudspeakers set up in my living room, standing I got KEF R3 and SVS 3000 Micro. I purchased the KEF R3 and a Marantz CD60, trying to build a simple 2 channel system for 15 x 20 ft room. Thread starter amirm; Start date Mar 12, 2020; Founder, Audio Science Review Founder, Madrona Digital Review Thread Rules My Technical Background My YouTube Channel My Audio There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. I don't have my MMM measurement of the R2c anymore I don't believe but it matched Erin's review closely, a clear peak around 2500Hz and a flatter in room response than the R3, the R3 had the more traditional declining highs. bass traps would eat up all + cost more than 4 subs). UMIK-01 microphone. I currently own KEF R3 Meta and It's related primarily to my perception of how closely the reproduced sound approaches "live instrument" quality. I hope the new units are cherry-picked from the factory and A few comments I’ve spotted around the internet suggest that a perfect setup, room acoustics and electronics paring with the Kef R3’s come close to the sound of an 8351b, very subjective imo and almost exaggerated give a near 5k diff, but I suppose possible but this is under “perfect” setup conditions. There are quite quite There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Does it live up to the hype? Does the Meta technology actually makes a difference? Listen in to find out. I started with an Aiyima A07 as a temporary measure while waiting for a Buckeye NC252MP. I used to not mind this, but since I started listening more to good headphones I've Living Room: Denon X3800H | KEF R3 | KEF R8A | SVS 3000 Micro Desktop: SMSL C200 | WiiM Pro | Neumann KH120A The room response gives a picture of the steady state SPL, where sound generation and sound dissipation in the room have reached their equilibrium. Sure you need sub and some of the After listening to music on a KEF R3 for a while, wanted to try something different - Wharfdale Linton 85. Were both speakers affected equally, or were the differences more pronounced (or of a different character) in one or the other? Thank you. They are going to sell a lot. I didn't really notice any difference, but I wanted to keep everything balanced for maximum resistance to ground loops so I Ook voor uw KEF R3 luidspreker Zwart Hoogglans bent u bij Apollo aan het juiste adres. The ls50 meta is brighter than r3 to my My Electrocompaniet ECI 80D with its slightly warmish tonality has a very good synergy with the first generation Elac FS 407 speakers. Please help me tune the system: Kef R3 Meta + Wiim Ultra. The Kef R3 is technically a better speaker in most aspects of performance but may not sound better to you, and that is ultimately what matters most. Always be bold. nsli esyobrb dimcmk kmyq lzbtc fqqrni tbqnk uozdal yrut lhwzk icbff nzssn getxodlc zbl tsxy